Methodological innovations for evidencing and estimating modern and traditional contraceptive prevalence and use dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa
Verification Status: Pending
Overall Assessment: Pending Verification
Methodological innovations for evidencing and estimating modern and traditional contraceptive prevalence and use dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa Abstract Contraceptive prevalence estimates are indicators of the performance of family planning programmes. Yet, available evidence suggests that national surveys may be underestimating the prevalence of traditional methods. The apparent underestimation of traditional methods stems from current approaches for collecting, analysing and reporting contraceptive data. We examined the effect of survey methodological innovations on the estimation of traditional and modern contraceptives. We used data from a cross-country comparative study conducted in DRC, Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. The sample comprised 9,075 in union and sexually active women not in union aged 15-49 years. The results showed that follow-up method-by-method questioning increased the reporting of both traditional and modern methods, with the increase being much higher for modern methods, while reducing the percentage of non-users. Revising the standard approach for computing contraceptive prevalence to account separately for concurrent traditional and modern method use revealed substantial underestimation of traditional methods use, particularly in DRC and Ghana. These findings underscore the need to revise current framing of questions and estimation approaches to improve the accuracy of contraceptive use estimates. The findings also highlight the importance of taking into account concurrent use of traditional and modern methods which is often ignored in family planning research. | Item Type | Article | |---|---| | Copyright holders | © 2026 The Author(s) | | Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > International Development | | Date Deposited | 24 March 2026 | | URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/137612 |
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!